When comparing builder gel and SNS (which stands for Signature Nail System), the choice between them often depends on factors like durability, aesthetics, and application technique. Here’s why we consider builder gel to be better than SNS:
1. Durability
Builder Gel also known as BIAB: Builder gel is known for its strength and flexibility. It creates a thick, sturdy layer that adheres well to the natural nail, providing strong support. It’s highly resistant to chips and cracks, making it ideal for those who need long-lasting nails.
SNS: While SNS is durable, it’s not as strong as builder gel. It is a dip powder system, and although it can last for weeks, it may be more prone to cracking or breaking, especially for those with softer nails.
2. Aesthetic Quality
Builder Gel: Builder gel provides a smooth, glossy finish that tends to look more natural and polished. It can also be shaped easily for a more custom, sculpted look, and it can be easily applied in layers for a variety of designs.
SNS: SNS offers a matte finish, which some may prefer for a more subtle, natural look. However, it typically doesn’t have the high-shine finish that builder gel provides unless additional topcoats are used.
Shaping and Sculpting
Builder Gel: Builder gel is often favoured for its sculpting capabilities. Nail technicians can mold it to the desired shape (such as extensions, stiletto, or coffin nails) and build the nail extensions with a smooth, even surface.
SNS: SNS is applied by dipping the nails into powder, which doesn’t allow for the same level of sculpting. While it provides some customisation through colour choices, it doesn’t offer as much versatility in shaping as builder gel.
4. Application Process
Builder Gel: The application of builder gel requires curing under a UV or LED light, which does take a bit more time than SNS. However, the process is precise, and you have more control over shaping and thickness.
SNS: SNS uses a dip-powder system that doesn’t require UV or LED light. The application can be quicker and simpler, but the lack of light-curing means it’s more challenging to achieve the precise, sculpted look that builder gel offers.
5. Thickness and Flexibility
Builder Gel: Builder gel is thicker and more flexible than SNS. It provides a more natural feel while still giving the nails strength. It also moves more naturally with the nail, which reduces the chances of cracking or lifting.
SNS: While SNS is strong, it tends to be thicker and less flexible. Some people find it less comfortable than builder gel because it can feel bulkier on the nails.
6. Removal Process
Builder Gel: Removing builder gel usually requires soaking in acetone or using a filing process, which can be time-consuming but allows for a more controlled removal. If done properly, it’s less damaging to the natural nail.
SNS: SNS is also removed by soaking in acetone, but because of its powder-based nature, it may require more effort and could potentially be more damaging if not removed carefully.
7. Nail Health
Builder Gel: When applied and removed correctly, builder gel is considered gentler on natural nails, as it doesn’t compromise the nail structure as much as SNS can. It also allows the nails to breathe better and causes less thinning over time.
SNS: While SNS is a popular choice, the repeated application and removal process does lead to thinning of natural nails, especially if not properly cared for.
Summary:
Builder gel is better than SNS for people seeking a more customisable, durable, and natural-looking option for nail enhancements. It allows for more precision, flexibility, and strength, making it ideal for creating nail extensions or sculpting intricate designs. At milk nails we promote healthy nails and we are not in the game of damaging nails! This is why we only work with builder gel and we source it from a highly reputable brand called "The Gel Bottle". In the game for healthy long lasting nails? Book with us now!
Comentários